Thank You For Coming To My Party Ideas

Hardworking ... is the Supreme Court this year.

Again an interesting ruling by the Supreme Court: there
relocation allowance not WAY possible

background
In a path in Berlin, an owner, who in his five condominiums tourists and seasonal workers are hired. It came a year to about 100 tenants change.
The apartment owners 'association decided that each flat owner has to pay in case of a change of residents due to temporary letting of a flat fee of 50 euros to the owners' association.
The rent owners complained against this decision and went up to the Federal (BGH).

decision
The Supreme Court has held that the decision of the owner community is invalid. Although
may decide on a home owners' association a relocation allowance effective. Such a decision only corresponds then to a proper office if the package is rated moderate and does not constitute an unjustified unequal treatment of property owners.
was here in the case decided the amount of the charge of 50 € fine. However, the judges complained that the payment obligation was to "limited use of agreed conditions" is limited and for example, moves the Owner even touch on. This constituted an unjustified unequal treatment dar. because it is not clear that the excluded from the system moves to a lower burden on the community property (for example, by wear and damage on the stairs) lead.

(BGH, Judgement of 01/10/2010, V ZR 220/09, published on 10.29.2010)